Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

{COMPANY_NAME}

cropper
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Essentials
    • Tools
    • Stories
    • Workflows
    • Ethics
    • Trends
    • News
    • Generative AI
    • TERMS OF SERVICE
    • Privacy Policy
Add Element
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
March 03.2025
3 Minutes Read

Meet Mindy, the Privacy-Focused AI Assistant from Jolla's Founders

Two men demonstrating privacy-friendly AI assistant at cafe.

Revolutionizing AI with Privacy in Mind

The founders of Jolla, known for their efforts in the mobile market, are now diving into the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Their new AI assistant, developed in collaboration with sister startup Venho.ai, aims to provide users a privacy-preserving alternative to current cloud-based AI solutions. By allowing users to keep their data secure and private, this advancement may redefine the relationship between humans and technology.

Meet Mindy: Your New AI Companion

Introduce Mindy, the brand name for Jolla's AI assistant. This software integrates deeply with users’ daily applications, such as emails, calendars, and social media. Users can converse with Mindy, asking it to summarize emails, book meetings, or filter social media feeds. Jolla envisions Mindy as a personal aide capable of acting on the user's behalf, while ensuring no personal data is transferred to data-hungry corporations.

Pushing Back Against Tech Giants

As AI continues to shape the software landscape, Jolla co-founders Antti Saarnio and Sami Pienimäki express a determined vision: to disrupt today's dominant cloud giants. With a history of software and hardware development, they believe that a decentralized AI ecosystem can provide superior control to users over their own information.

Redefining Personal Data Privacy

The key selling point of Mindy is its commitment to user privacy. Unlike many contemporary AI assistants, Mindy doesn't rely on expansive data cloud storage. The assistant operates on smaller AI models that can be hosted locally, meaning that user queries and actions are processed without sending sensitive information to external servers.

From Concept to Creation: The Jolla Mind2

To complement the AI assistant, Jolla has released the Mind2, a device designed to support AI functionality without compromising privacy. The Mind2 operates like a mini-server—users can host their AI capabilities locally, allowing for even greater privacy assurances.

Addressing Challenges in AI Responsiveness

During a recent demonstration, TechCrunch noted that while Mindy shows great promise, initial queries had a slight lag time, an issue the Jolla team is addressing with ongoing optimizations. Users can look forward to faster response times as the team continues to refine their technology.

The Future of AI: Personalization and Control

As Jolla pushes for a larger slice of the AI market, they emphasize the importance of an individualized experience. With customizable avatars like Mindy, users can personalize their interactions with AI to align with their own preferences, reinforcing the concept of ownership over one’s digital experience.

The B2B Potential of Jolla's AI Assistant

Not only is Jolla targeting individual consumers, but there’s also growing interest from businesses looking for secure AI solutions. The company receives inquiries from telecom operators and others interested in the potential of Mindy as a home hub, reflecting the vast possibilities this technology holds.

Final Thoughts: Empowering Users in the AI Era

The launch of Jolla’s Mindy AI assistant marks a significant moment in the realm of privacy-focused technology. As users grow increasingly concerned about data collection, solutions like Mindy empower individuals with the tools to maintain control over their digital selves. Users can anticipate a subscription service that provides not just an assistant but a privacy-centric approach to digital interactions.

With prices starting at €699 for the Mind2 device, pairs with Jolla's service, privacy-conscious tech enthusiasts will want to keep a close eye on this promising development in the generative AI landscape.

Generative AI

4 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
09.15.2025

Exploring the AI Bubble: Bret Taylor's Insights on Opportunities and Risks

Update The AI Bubble: What Does Bret Taylor Mean? Bret Taylor, board chair at OpenAI, recently sparked conversations about the state of artificial intelligence (AI) in our economy during an interview with The Verge. Notably, Taylor echoed sentiments expressed by OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, asserting that we are currently caught in an AI bubble. But unlike the traditional definition of a financial bubble, Taylor believes that this temporary state is not purely negative. In fact, he sees the potential for a transformative impact on our economy, similar to what the internet brought in its early days. Comparisons to the Dot-Com Era: Lessons Learned In his remarks, Taylor characterized today’s AI landscape as reminiscent of the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. Just like many internet startups saw astronomic valuations and eventual crashes, he argues that many players in today’s AI market will face similar pitfalls. However, he also emphasizes that in retrospect, those who invested in the internet were largely justified; the ultimate value created by the technology far outweighed the losses for some. Understanding the Risks: What Investors Should Know Investors in the AI sector should approach their strategies with caution, as the potential for substantial losses looms. Taylor’s acknowledgment of the AI bubble serves as a warning; companies may rise quickly but can just as quickly fall into obscurity. The key takeaway for investors is to carefully assess market trends and focus on sustainable practices rather than jumping into every shiny new venture. The Positive Side of the Bubble Despite the risks associated with an AI bubble, Taylor’s perspective offers a refreshing outlook: while some may suffer losses, the long-term benefits of AI are undeniable. From healthcare innovations to advancements in transportation, the technology has the potential to create economic waves far beyond initial investment moments. These transformational changes might take years to fully realize but are essential for societal progress. Public Sentiment and the Future of AI As we navigate the uncertainties of this bubble, public sentiment plays a crucial role. Many are skeptical of AI technologies, worrying about job displacement or ethical concerns surrounding data use. However, Taylor encourages open discourse on these issues. Engaging with the community and addressing concerns upfront can foster trust and collaboration, ultimately shaping AI's future in a positive light. What History Can Teach Us About Current Trends Drawing parallels to the late '90s, it’s worth noting that every economic bubble comes with lessons learned. Businesses that adapted quickly usually emerged stronger. In the AI sector, businesses that prioritize ethical considerations and user education will likely withstand pressures better than those that do not. Investors and startup founders alike can take this advice to heart as they ponder the future of their ventures. The Importance of Innovation Amidst Uncertainty As Taylor aptly pointed out, recognizing both the opportunity and risk in current AI trends is essential. Those involved in AI are in a unique position to influence how the technology is developed and utilized. Innovators should seize this moment to advocate for responsible AI that benefits all layers of society, addressing skepticism head-on. Preparing for the AI Future: What Next? Looking ahead, it’s crucial for stakeholders—be they investors, tech leaders, or consumers—to equip themselves with knowledge and foresight. Understanding the historical context of technology bubbles can help demystify current trends. As AI gradually reshapes our workplaces and everyday lives, collaboration between developers, investors, and the public will be vital for building a sustainable future. Ultimately, while the AI landscape is laden with challenges and uncertainties, it is also ripe with potential. Embracing this dual reality can lead to fruitful discussions and encourage proactive efforts towards a more innovative future.

09.14.2025

California's SB 53: A Groundbreaking Step in AI Safety Regulation

Update California's Bold Step in AI Regulation: What SB 53 Means In a groundbreaking move for artificial intelligence (AI) governance, California's state senate has passed SB 53, a bill designed to ensure greater transparency and safety protocols within large AI labs. Authored by state senator Scott Wiener, the bill mandates major tech firms to share details about their safety practices and establishes whistleblower protections, encouraging employees to voice concerns about AI risks without fear of reprisal. Understanding the Core of SB 53: Transparency and Accountability SB 53 aims to tackle the growing concern surrounding AI technologies and their potential risks. The new law proposes creating a public cloud dubbed CalCompute, which is set to expand access to computational resources, thus enabling researchers and smaller companies to work within a safer framework. By mandating transparency from larger companies, the bill is designed to hold them accountable for the ethical deployment of AI systems. Public Response and Industry Pushback As with any significant legislative change, SB 53 has stirred mixed reactions. While consumer advocates and some policymakers hail the increased safety measures, numerous tech giants, venture capitalists, and lobbying groups have expressed their opposition. Notably, a letter from OpenAI urged Governor Gavin Newsom to sync state regulations with existing federal and European guidelines to simplify compliance and prevent overlapping requirements. Governor Newsom's Decision: What Next? Governor Newsom has yet to publicly comment on SB 53, having previously vetoed a more comprehensive safety bill from Wiener last year. While he recognized the need for AI safety, he critiqued the stringent standards proposed for all AI models, regardless of their usage context. It remains to be seen whether he will embrace SB 53, given its efforts to balance safety with economic flexibility. The Influence of AI Expert Recommendations The revision of SB 53 comes after a panel of AI experts provided crucial recommendations at Newsom's behest following the prior veto. A key amendment stipulates that AI firms generating under $500 million annually will only need to disclose broad safety measures, while larger firms will be subject to stricter reporting obligations. This approach aims to reduce the burden on smaller companies while ensuring larger entities uphold higher standards of safety. The Impact of SB 53: A Model for Other States? Should SB 53 be signed into law, it could serve as a benchmark for other states considering similar legislation. The law reflects rising concerns about AI safety, aligning California’s regulations with a growing demand for accountability from tech companies. As the technology landscape continues to evolve, states across the country may follow suit, seeking to safeguard citizens from the rapidly advancing capabilities of AI. A Look at Broader Trends in AI Legislation California is not the only state grappling with AI regulations; other regions are also introducing measures aimed at ethical AI deployment. The broadening discourse surrounding AI safety, data privacy, and ethical implications has sparked debates on national and global platforms. With experts pushing for cohesive regulatory frameworks, the conversation is shifting towards defining the responsibilities of tech firms as they innovate. What It Means for Citizens and Workers Alike At its core, SB 53 embodies a movement toward responsible AI practices—one that prioritizes citizen safety and worker protections. By enabling whistleblower protections and ensuring transparency, this legislation empowers individuals within the tech workforce to advocate for ethical standards in their workplaces. Moreover, it highlights the need for public discourse on the implications of AI advancements for everyday life. In Conclusion: A Call for Participation in AI Safety Discourse As we await the governor's decision, it's essential for all stakeholders—including citizens, tech workers, and policymakers—to engage in thoughtful discussions about the role of regulation in technology. Understanding and participating in the ongoing debates surrounding AI safety is vital for ensuring that technological advancements align with societal values and ethics. The passage of SB 53 could be just the beginning of a broader transformation in how we approach AI governance.

09.13.2025

Why Google is Called a 'Bad Actor' by People CEO in Content Theft Accusation

Update Google's Role in the Evolving AI Landscape: A Worrisome Trend?The recent accusations from Neil Vogel, CEO of People, Inc., have thrown a spotlight on a troubling trend in the relationship between traditional publishers and tech giants like Google. During the Fortune Brainstorm Tech conference, Vogel labeled Google a 'bad actor' for allegedly using the same bot that crawls websites for its search engine to also gather content for its AI products. This raises significant ethical questions about the use of content, the power dynamics in the digital sphere, and the future of online publishing.The Diminishing Influence of Search TrafficVogel's remarks were underscored by stark statistics—once, Google Search was responsible for a hefty 90% of People, Inc.’s traffic. However, that figure has tumbled to the high 20s, prompting concerns about the sustainability of relying on third-party platforms for content distribution. The decline represents not only a loss of direct traffic but also signals a shift in how audiences seek and consume information online. As publishers like People Inc. adapt to this shift, the need for a proactive stance against unlicensed content usage becomes more pressing.AI Crawlers: The New Predators?Vogel emphasized the necessity of blocking AI crawlers—automated programs that sweep through online content to train AI systems—claiming they rob publishers of their intellectual property. The concern is valid; many companies leverage these bots without compensating content creators. In a rapidly changing tech world, protecting intellectual property has never been more vital, especially as AI systems become ubiquitous. Vogel's collaboration with Cloudflare to block these unauthorized crawlers represents one approach that could redefine the relationship between publishers and tech giants, forcing negotiations over fair usage practices.Rethinking Publisher StrategiesIn light of these challenges, publishers are rethinking their strategies. In Vogel’s case, he noted that securing partnerships with AI firms like OpenAI could be the way forward. These partnerships could foster transparency and provide a revenue-sharing model, countering the negative impacts of Google’s crawlers. Such collaborative efforts could support a healthier ecosystem for both tech companies and content creators, ensuring that both parties benefit from the use of digital content.What’s Next for Content Creators?The ongoing tension between Google and the publishing world raises questions about the future of content creation and distribution. As AI-generated content becomes commonplace, how will originality be defined and protected? Furthermore, Vogel’s warning about reliance on Google’s traffic highlights the need for publishers to diversify their audience engagement strategies. Building strong direct relationships with readers, leveraging alternative platforms, and fostering community engagement are essential to sustain traffic in the turbulent digital landscape.The Larger Ethical Debate Involving AIThe accusations surrounding Google extend beyond just a single publisher's grievance. They highlight a growing ethical debate regarding how AI technologies interact with human creativity and labor. As AI systems are integrated into more aspects of everyday life, should we be worried about the rights of content creators? The challenge lies in establishing a framework where both AI advancements and content creator rights are respected.Legislative Action: A Possible Solution?As the landscape shifts, there may be a call for legislative action to protect the rights of content owners while regulating AI technologies. Governments and regulatory bodies face the challenge of balancing innovation with the protection of intellectual property. By enacting laws that define how AI can utilize existing content, a more equitable system could be achieved. However, such measures would necessitate collaboration between tech companies, legislators, and the publishing community.Conclusion: What the Conversation RevealsVogel’s candid remarks about Google speak volumes about the ongoing struggle between traditional publishers and the new digital playground dominated by tech giants. As the relationship between AI applications and content ownership continues to evolve, the discussions we engage in today—like Vogel's at the Fortune Brainstorm Tech conference—shape the path for the future of creative work. Publishers, tech giants, and creators alike must navigate this complex terrain with innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations front and center.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*